Introduce VERIFY_AND_CLEAR shorthand (#19370)

Which is just a syntactic sugar for
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations to reduce the visual clutter
in unit-tests.
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Kerkmann 2022-12-18 21:55:14 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 7aa2d791f6
commit c2b13bd77b
Failed to generate hash of commit
21 changed files with 257 additions and 251 deletions

View file

@ -175,23 +175,23 @@ TEST_F(KeyPress, PressPlusEqualReleaseBeforePress) {
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT));
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT, KC_EQUAL));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_plus.release();
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT));
EXPECT_EMPTY_REPORT(driver);
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_eql.press();
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (key_eql.report_code));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_eql.release();
EXPECT_EMPTY_REPORT(driver);
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
}
TEST_F(KeyPress, PressPlusEqualDontReleaseBeforePress) {
@ -206,24 +206,24 @@ TEST_F(KeyPress, PressPlusEqualDontReleaseBeforePress) {
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT));
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT, KC_EQUAL));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_eql.press();
EXPECT_EMPTY_REPORT(driver);
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_EQUAL));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_plus.release();
// BUG: Should really still return KC_EQUAL, but this is fine too
EXPECT_EMPTY_REPORT(driver);
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_eql.release();
EXPECT_NO_REPORT(driver);
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
}
TEST_F(KeyPress, PressEqualPlusReleaseBeforePress) {
@ -237,24 +237,24 @@ TEST_F(KeyPress, PressEqualPlusReleaseBeforePress) {
key_eql.press();
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_EQUAL));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_eql.release();
EXPECT_EMPTY_REPORT(driver);
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_plus.press();
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT));
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT, KC_EQUAL));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_plus.release();
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT));
EXPECT_EMPTY_REPORT(driver);
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
}
TEST_F(KeyPress, PressEqualPlusDontReleaseBeforePress) {
@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ TEST_F(KeyPress, PressEqualPlusDontReleaseBeforePress) {
key_eql.press();
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_EQUAL));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_plus.press();
// BUG: The sequence is a bit strange, but it works, the end result is that
@ -277,16 +277,16 @@ TEST_F(KeyPress, PressEqualPlusDontReleaseBeforePress) {
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT));
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT, KC_EQUAL));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_eql.release();
// I guess it's fine to still report shift here
EXPECT_REPORT(driver, (KC_LEFT_SHIFT));
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
key_plus.release();
EXPECT_EMPTY_REPORT(driver);
run_one_scan_loop();
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&driver);
VERIFY_AND_CLEAR(driver);
}